The Domesday Survey, 1086
The so-called Domesday Book is in all probability
the official summary of the survey of 1086 arranged by county and thereafter by
the holders of land in those counties, with subdivisions by hundreds and
(named) places.
In the county of Grentebrigscire (Cambridgeshire)
there are three references to Caldecote.
(1) Count
Alan's land
The first occurs in Chapter XIII under the land held
by Count Alan (of Britanny) who held the honour of Richmond in Yorkshire. Count
Alan was a considerable land holder in Cambridgeshire with land in Fulboum,
Cherry Hinton, Teversham, Horseheath, West Wickham, Barham, Linton, Cambridge,
Abington, Babraham, Pampisford, Whittlesford, Duxford, Fowlmcre, Harston,
Shelford, Hatley, Wendy, Bassingbourn, Whaddon, Meldreth, Melbourn,
Grantchester, Haslingfield, Barrington, Shepreth, Orwell, Wratworth, Whitwell,
Long Stanton, Waterbeach, Dry Drayton, Ditton, Cheveley, Swaffham, Badlingham,
Exning, Burwell, Fordham, Isleham, Soham, Wicken, Dullingham, Stetchworth,
Westley Waterless, Borough Green, Carlton, West Wratting and Balsham in
addition to his holdings in the hundred of Stow. These holdings are listed as
being (in order) in Eversden, Kingston, Toft, Bourn, Caldecote, Longstow and Hatley. Clearly therefore the Caldecote referred to here
is our parish (there is always the danger that a reference to Caldecote may not
in fact be “our” Caldecote).
In Caldecote tenet Almarus de comite dimidiam hidam.
Terra est j carrucae et dimidiae. In dominio est j carruca et iij bordarii cum
dimidia carruca. Ibi ij servi et pratum j carrucae et dimidiae. Nemus ad domos
et saepes. Valet et valuit semper xxx solidos.
“In Caldecote Almar holds from count [Alan] half a
hide. There is land for one and a half ploughs. There is one plough in the
demesne and [there are] three bordars with half a plough. There [there are] two
serfs and [there is] meadow for one and a half ploughs. [There is] coppice for
the houses and fences. It is and always was worth thirty shillings.”
(2) Harduin
de Scaler's land
The second reference occurs in Chapter XXIIII (sic)
under the land of Harduin de Scalers. Harduin is listed as having land in
Swaffham, Staploc hundred, Dullingham, Westley Waterless, Carlton, West
Wrating, Horseheath, West Wickhami, Babraham, Pampisford, Whittlesford,
Hinxton, Ickleton, Duxford, Hauxton, Shelford, Morden, Croydon, Wendy,
Litlington, Abington Pigotts, Bassingboum, Whaddon, Meldreth, Melbourn,
Shepreth, Orwell, Wratworth, Whitwell, Papworth, Elsworth, Connington,
Boxworth, Over, Dry Drayton, Sletchworth, Balsham, Thriplow, in addition to the
holdings in the holdings in the hundred of Long Stowe. These holdings are (in
order) in Eversden, Kingston, Caldecote, Longstow, Caxton and Croxton. Once
again, therefore, it seems safe to assume that the Caldecote referred to is
“our” parish.
In Caldecote tenent ij milites de Harduino iij
virgate et x acras. Terra est ij carucis et ibi sunt cum vj bordariis. Pratum
ij carrucis. Valet et valuit lij solidos. Hanc teerram tenuerunt ij sochemanni
sub Eddeva et potuerunt recedere.
“Two knights hold three virgates and ten acres from
Harduin in Caldecote. There is land for two ploughs and they are there with six
bordars. [There is] meadow for two ploughs. It was and is worth fifty-two
shillings. Two sochemen held this land under Eddeva, and they might depart.”
One of the residences of Harduin was at Caxton Moats
(which can still be seen on the footpath from Caxton to Eltisley).
(iii) David
de Argentomago's land
The third reference occurs in Chapter XXXVII under
the land of David de Argentomago. Only three holdings are listed for David in
Cambridgeshire. There are (in order) two in the Hundred of Stow - (Caldecote
and Croxton and one in the Chesterton Hundred (Westwick). There is a Caldecote
mentioned on ancient maps just south of Croxton and this may possibly be a
reference to that hamlet. Certainly David was lord of Croxton. It may well be,
however, that the Croxton Caldecote is a later anachronism. Certainly all
discussions on the Domesday Survey attribute David’s Caldecote estate to the
vill bordering Bourn.
David de Argentomago in Caldecote tenet j virgatam
et xx acras. Terra est j carrucae et ibi est cum iij bordariis et j cotario.
Pratum j carrucae. Valet et valuit xx solidos; Tempore Regis Edwardi, xxx
solidos. Hanc terram tenuit Sigar, homo Wallef comitis et recedere potuit.
“David de Argentomago holds one virgate and twenty
acres in Caldecote. There is land for one plough and it is there with three
bordars and one cottar. [There is] meadow for one plough. It is and was worth
twenty shillings in the time of King
Edward, 30 shillings. Sigar, the man of Earl Wallef, held this land, and he
might depart.”
Caldecote as a vill
What can these three references tell us ? First of
all they reveal that Caldecole was a vill or village within the hundred of Stow
in the “shire” (the old English is “scit”) of the Borough of Cambridge. This
shire was probably an artificial division representing the district occupied by
the Danish armies and centred on the town of Cambridge. The shires were
subdivided into “hundreds”, which were units of local government in the tenth
century mainly dealing with the administration of justice and finance. In
theory each hundred was assessed at 100 hides for the purposes of taxation.
Hundreds were in turn subdivided into vills or villages each usually containing
one or more manors (demesnes) in which the local peasantry were obliged to
work.
Hides, virgates and acres
A hide consisted of 4 virgates and a virgate
consisted of 30 acres. A hide, therefore, was 120 acres. However, this must not
he taken as an actual measurement of acreage on the ground. It was more like a
notional term for taxation purposes or in the medieval phrase “geld”
liabilities. Thus, although we can deduce that the total “acreage” held by the
three land owners in Caldecote was 200 acres (Table 1), this figure should not
be taken as referring to actual acreage, but rather used as a guide to how much
the village was liable to pay in tax.
Table 1. Deductions from the Domesday Survey of Caldecote
|
Land holder |
Hides |
Virgates |
Acres |
Total acres |
|
Count Alan |
½ |
- |
- |
60 |
|
Harduin |
- |
3 |
10 |
100 |
|
David |
- |
1 |
10 |
40 |
|
Total |
½ |
4 |
20 |
200 |
Arable and meadowland
Arable land (usually referred to only by the Latin
term “terra” or "land", as in our three references) was calculated in
terms of plough-teams (carrucae) that could be employed on it. Each plough-team
was considered to have eight oxen. The references to Caldecote provide land for
four and a half plough-teams, i.e. 36 oxen, for Caldecote land holders; this
was divided between the “demesne” land of the manor or home farm of the Lord
(count Alan had one plough-team, Harduin none and David none) and the other
classes of population (holding land for three and a half plough-teains).
Meadowland (pratum) was land bordering a stream which produced hay and was
usually two or three times more profitable than arable land. Our three
references show that the unit of measurement for such meadowland was again the
plough-team, with the total meadow given as land for four and a half
plough-teams. In short, the total amount of arable and meadow is exactly equal.
Whether this was simply an administrative total or an actual indication of the
respective amounts of meadowland and arable is unclear, but the answer does
have considerable implications for the Highfields area. Indeed if the total
acreage of the parish in 1086 was only 200 acres then it can be confidently
asserted that the boundaries of the parish could not have extended north of
Stinnages Wood.
Population
The
population of Caldecote can be deduced as 17, made up of 2 sokemen (who were
free men and descendants of the rank and file of the Danish armies of the ninth
century). They could or could not (i.e. they had the choice) dispose of their
land without obtaining the permission of the land holder); 12 bordars, 1 cottars
(bordars and cottars possibly cover the same basic class of “cottagers” and 2
serfs (bondmen or servi were undoubtedly slaves). It must not be assumed,
however, that this was the total population of Caldecote at the time of the
survey. These figures refer only to the heads of households and in order to
reach an accurate figure of the population of Caldecote we must multiply (as
most scholars now agree) by a figure of 5. This gives a population of 17 x 5 =
85 people living in (perhaps) 17 dwellings. Most
if not all of these would have been either in the old village of Caldecote or
on the hill above the village, i.e. in the vicinity of the present Carrara Pig
Farm area. It can be concluded, therefore, that with a population of about 85
Caldecote was an established agricultural village in 1086.